Comments on: “I’m Web 2.0!” says Web 2.0 Validator

By: Dan

Dan — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:04:15 +0000

Haha I think it’s funny! Whether anything it says is true or not is irrelevant really - most of the questions/requirements on the Web 2.0 validator prove how ridiculous the “web 2.0 wannabe movement” actually is - it pokes fun at web 2.0 sites!

By: Dansgalaxy

Dansgalaxy — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:26:55 +0000

Sorry dan this thing is complete CRAP! and so wrong, i checked my dansgalaxy.co.uk while its nto even finished yet it came up with 3 out of 66 and most of them it got wrong, it most definatly dont have the blink tag, it DOES have style sheets and loads of stupid questions…
Dan

By: Forrest

Forrest — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:33:53 +0000

I scored 10 of 66. I don’t understand a lot of the ways they measure the 2.0-ishness of a site, though?

* Denies the existance of Rocky V ? No ( The movie? )

* Uses Google Maps API? No ( Yes I do! I put a great deal of effort into fighting wordpress until it accepts Google Maps code! )

* Appears to be web 3.0 ? Yes! ( Huh? )

* Appears to be non-empty ? No

…

By: Gun Control « Alexander The Great

Gun Control « Alexander The Great — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:28:00 +0000

[...] a gun. (Heck, I managed to type another person’s name into the from field commenting on a blog.) It’s nobody’s damn business that I commmit a misdomeanor every day (possession of a [...]

By: James Lewitzke

James Lewitzke — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:50:04 +0000

Nice link Dan,

My blog’s even less Web 2.0-ish than yours, with a high score of 6 out of 65 (not sure why it isn’t 66, like in your results, though).