Comments on: Extremist Conservative lies on Conservatipedia

By: ioTus

ioTus — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:26:06 +0000

I do get the sense that its satire.

By: Dansgalaxy

Dansgalaxy — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:14:00 +0000

Wow thats stupid, btw before the page could finish loading my school filter blocked it…

“Atheists were people that believed in the concept of God, and than were angry, for whatever reason. From than on, they called themselves “atheists”.”

- This is COMPLETE BS!
i would class my self as a atheist for the simple reason i find it unbeliveable that a almighty being created us, thats my view and that of many others.
I have never belived in god and have always found it illogical to do so (i DO NOT hate those who do).

You (Conservatipedia) are the kind of person who give the religious a bad name.

By: Conservatipedia (SPAM Report) « Alexander The Great

Conservatipedia (SPAM Report) « Alexander The Great — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:18:06 +0000

[...] site regrettably titled God Is For Suckers threw Conservatipedia to the lions. Dan Price has covered the story. Andrew Sullivan said “truth isn’t always [...]

By: Adam

Adam — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:09:11 +0000

I’m with Stardust. This has to be satire, and weak at that. There’s no way anyone could rant that incoherently and be serious, even if it’s based on religion and conservative viewpoints.

By: Whaddya Kno? ConservApedia! « Alexander The Great

Whaddya Kno? ConservApedia! « Alexander The Great — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:43:24 +0000

[...] politics, stupid, wikipedia I wrote a post about Conservatipedia, which was picked up by Super Blogger Daniel Price of Wales, England. The site is, well, read the blog entry, then head over and see what you think. Then leave a [...]

By: stardust

stardust — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:49:41 +0000

Conservatipedia appears to be a feeble attempt at satire. And, as I posted on his/her site, more originality is required.

By: John Alexander (who forgets his own name ;))

John Alexander (who forgets his own name ;)) — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:23:22 +0000

Well, it’s patently obvious that Conservatipedia doesn’t understand what the words “indisputable” and “fact” mean. That’s clear from reading their headlines, and it’s clear from the defense here.

10 % of Americans are atheists, and 10 % have reproductive difficulty? I’d love to see where these numbers came from (conservative lie method #1 - make stuff up). More to the point, even if this were true, the fact that the numbers are the same does not at all mean that they describe identical sections of a country with 300,000,000 people.

That statement is as idiotic as saying that 99 % of violent criminals in prison drank milk as children, ergo milk turns people into cold blooded killers.

Funny how in China and India, Christianity is a minority religion, but these 2 countries account for almost half the world’s population. I guess they must be importing babies from Vatican City.

By: Dan

Dan — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:03:07 +0000

In the UK, most people are atheist. However, most still have children.

This clearly disproves your point.

And for your info, I would class myself as a Christian.

Dan

By: Conservatipedia

Conservatipedia — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:47:50 +0000

Thank you for taking an interest in my site.

To clear a few things up. God doesn’t let atheists reproduce. 10% of Americans don’t believe in God, and what do you know 10% have troubles reproducing.

And your update. Let me make something very clear for you. It is not possible to not believe in God. Atheists were people that believed in the concept of God, and than were angry, for whatever reason. From than on, they called themselves “atheists”.

All my information is indisputable fact, unlike your conjecture.

Thanks again for your interest. You may enjoy my new article, Man of the Year: Karl Rove.

By: James Lewitzke

James Lewitzke — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:48:34 +0000

Wow, I’m no “Political Extremist” or anything, but blaming something you don’t believe in *is* really stupid.

I also like this quote from the Atheists out to get children post:
“Atheists try to use the power of logic and reason to attack a child’s mind and brainwash it for their own selfish purpose.”

Thanks for writing about this amusing fact, Dan